Pacific Products vs Ong; G.R. No. 33777; 30 Jan 1990; 181 SCRA 536

in Legal Chyme by

BML Trading won a bid to supply the Bureau of Communication with 15,000 pounds of bluestone copper sulphate worth P10,500. Before the Bureau could release the payment to BML, the Sheriff garnished P9,111.70  of the P10,000.

Whether or not the garnishment of the amount payable to BML while it was still in the possession of the Bureau of Communication was illegal, therefore null and void.

YES. By executing the garnishment against the money while still in the possession of the Bureau of Communication, a government agency was included in the action. Being a government agency, the doctrine of state immunity applies.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.